Skip to content
Positionlog
Menu

Prices on this site are read off vendors’ own pages and carry the day they were read.

The board · ordered by cost per tracked keyword · read 24 Sept 2026

The best rank tracker is the cheapest one that watches everything you need

Six rank trackers, ordered by the only number that keeps growing after you buy: what one tracked keyword costs per month. Every price read off the vendor's own pricing page on 24 September 2026, with the ones that publish no price marked as publishing no price.

The board, by cost per tracked keywordEach entry plan's published monthly price divided by the tracked keywords it allows. Same numbers as the table below, drawn from the same array. Nightwatch publishes in euro.
  1. SE RankingCore · 2,000 keywords$0.06per keyword / mo$129/mo
  2. AccuRankerProfessional · 2,000 keywords$0.11per keyword / mo$224/mo
  3. NightwatchStarter · 500 keywords€0.16per keyword / mo€79/mo
  4. AhrefsLite · 750 keywords$0.17per keyword / mo$129/mo
  5. SemrushSEO · 500 keywords$0.28per keyword / mo$139/mo
One results page, top to bottom. A tracker reports the position of the organic result — the lane near the bottom here — which is why a page can hold position one and still sit below a screenful of everything else.

If you want one answer: SE Ranking is the rank tracker most small teams should buy, because its Core plan tracks 2,000 keywords daily for $129 a month, which works out at roughly six cents a keyword — the lowest entry-plan figure on this board. If your list is small enough to fit inside Google's own free tools instead, use those and keep the $129, and this page will tell you exactly where that line falls.

Everything below is priced by the unit that actually scales: the tracked keyword. A tool that feels cheap at 200 keywords can be the most expensive thing in your stack at 2,000, and the step you land on matters more than the headline price. Allowances come in fixed steps, so you buy the step, not the keyword.

How this board is ordered

Cost per tracked keyword, cheapest first, using each vendor's entry plan exactly as published. That figure is the monthly price divided by the tracked keywords the plan allows — nothing modelled, nothing estimated, and the chart at the top of this page is generated from the same array as the table below, so the two cannot drift apart.

What this board deliberately does not rank is accuracy. No vendor publishes an audited accuracy figure, no independent audit of rank data exists, and this desk has not run one either. Any site telling you which tracker is "most accurate" is telling you something nobody can know, because there is no reference reading to compare against: two trackers watching the same keyword from the same city can legitimately return different numbers on the same morning.

Entry plans as published on each vendor's own pricing page, read 24 September 2026. Cost per keyword is the monthly price divided by the tracked keywords the plan allows. Nightwatch publishes in euro; AccuRanker's page does not state a currency.
TrackerEntry planMonthlyBilled annuallyTracked keywordsPer keyword / month
SE RankingCore$129.00$103.20/mo2,000 dailyabout $0.06
AccuRankerProfessional$22410% off, per-month figure not published2,000 (3,000 and 5,000 tiers above)about $0.11
AhrefsLite$129$107.76/mo750 in Rank Trackerabout $0.17
NightwatchStarter€79€948/year500about €0.16
SemrushSEO$139$117.33/mo500 dailyabout $0.28
MangoolsBasicnot publishednot publishednot publishednot published

Two rows on that table are worth reading twice. Mangools publishes the names of its plans — Basic, Premium and Agency — but no prices that a plain request for the page ever receives; the figures are drawn in the browser. And AccuRanker publishes a 10% annual discount without publishing what the discounted month costs, so the annual column says so instead of doing the arithmetic on your behalf and presenting the result as the vendor's price.

SE Ranking: the cheapest published keyword

SE Ranking's Core plan is $129.00 a month, or $103.20 a month billed annually — the page calls that a 20% discount — and it covers 2,000 keywords tracked daily, 10 projects and one manager seat. That is the lowest cost per tracked keyword of any entry plan here, and it is not close — though note that AccuRanker's single Professional plan holds 3,000 and 5,000-keyword tiers at the same $224, so a full 5,000-keyword list lands cheaper there than here.

The step above is Growth at $279.00 a month, or $223.20 annually, for 5,000 daily keywords, 30 projects and three seats. There is no plan below Core, so a five-keyword hobby project pays the same $129 as a 2,000-keyword agency retainer; this is the shape of the whole category, and it is why the free options later on this page matter.

Two add-ons change the sum if you need them, and both are priced separately rather than bundled: AI Search is $89.00 a month on monthly billing or $71.20 on annual, and an Agency Pack is $69.00 a month on annual billing only. The trial is fourteen days and the page describes it as fully functional.

Partner link, tagged sponsored and nofollow: this site is paid a share if you subscribe. The order of the board is arithmetic rather than opinion — monthly price divided by tracked keywords — so you can re-check it on the vendor’s own page in a minute.

AccuRanker: daily updates, enterprise shape

AccuRanker's entry tier is Professional at $224 a month, with keyword tiers shown as 2,000, 3,000 and 5,000 and daily updates on all of them. At the 2,000-keyword tier that is around eleven cents a keyword — roughly double SE Ranking — and you are paying for a tool built narrowly around tracking rather than a suite that also does audits and backlinks.

Above that, Expert is $764 a month for 10,000 to 25,000 keywords and adds dynamic tagging, AI CTR, AI Search Volume, Google Data Studio and what the page calls unlimited read API. Past 25,000 keywords the page stops publishing prices and says to contact them; the Enterprise tier is where unlimited users and domains, BigQuery and raw SERP HTML access live.

Annual billing takes 10% off, in the page's words: choose an annual payment and receive a 10% discount on your chosen plan. The discounted monthly figure is not printed anywhere, and neither is the currency — the pricing page carries a Danish VAT number and no currency symbol legend, so treat the figures as the vendor's own unlabelled numbers rather than assuming dollars.

Partner link, tagged sponsored and nofollow: this site is paid a share if you subscribe. The order of the board is arithmetic rather than opinion — monthly price divided by tracked keywords — so you can re-check it on the vendor’s own page in a minute.

Mangools SERPWatcher: the one that will not show you a price

SERPWatcher is the rank tracker inside the Mangools bundle, and it is the row on this board that cannot be filled in. The plans page names Mangools Basic, Mangools Premium and Mangools Agency, and publishes a 48-hour money-back guarantee, but no monthly or annual price appears in the page itself — three different Mangools URLs were requested on 24 September 2026 and none of them contained a figure.

That is not an accusation of anything; plenty of vendors render prices in the browser. It does mean that a comparison page cannot quote Mangools without either opening the page yourself or copying a number from a review that may be a year stale. This board does the first and refuses the second. If the bundle appeals — and the case for it is that you are buying keyword research, SERP analysis and backlinks alongside the tracking — open the plans page and read the figure on the day.

Partner link, tagged sponsored and nofollow: this site is paid a share if you subscribe. The order of the board is arithmetic rather than opinion — monthly price divided by tracked keywords — so you can re-check it on the vendor’s own page in a minute.

The suites: tracking inside Semrush and Ahrefs

Both of the big suites include a rank tracker, and if you already pay for one the question is whether its allowance covers your list rather than whether to buy a tracker at all.

Semrush's entry SEO plan is $139 a month, $117.33 billed annually, and lists 500 keywords to track daily. Pro+ at $299 raises that to 1,500 daily keywords and Advanced at $549 to 5,000. At the entry tier that is roughly twenty-eight cents per tracked keyword, the highest on this board — which is the right answer if you want the whole suite and the wrong one if tracking is all you need.

Ahrefs' Lite plan is $129 a month, $107.76 annually, and its Rank Tracker holds 750 tracked keywords; Standard at $249 holds 2,000 and Advanced at $449 holds 5,000. Ahrefs closed its affiliate programme in 2019, so nothing on this site earns a penny from naming it, which is worth saying plainly on a page where most of the other rows do pay.

Nightwatch: seats that do not cost extra

Nightwatch prices in euro, which is why it sits slightly outside the dollar comparisons: Starter is €79 a month or €948 a year for 500 keywords across 5 sites, Professional €159 a month for 2,500 keywords across 25 sites, and Agency €399 a month for 7,500 keywords across 100 sites. Enterprise is custom and starts, per the page, above 20,000 keywords.

The detail that separates it from most of this board is that user seats are unlimited on every plan with no per-seat fee — SE Ranking's Core plan, by contrast, includes one manager seat. If several people need to open the same dashboard, a tool that charges per seat can quietly overtake one that looks dearer per keyword. Its affiliate programme has not been verified by anyone on this site, so the link here is an ordinary one and it earns nothing.

The free options, which are the right answer more often than this page would like

Google Search Console costs nothing, covers every query you appear for rather than a list you chose in advance, and comes from Google rather than from scraping its results. What it reports is not a position you can watch: in Google's words, the position value shown in the Performance report is the topmost position occupied by a link to your property or page in search results, averaged across all queries in which your property appeared, and a link must get an impression for its position to be recorded. The default view covers the past three months.

The second free option is desktop software. SEO PowerSuite publishes a free edition of Rank Tracker whose own feature list includes unlimited keyword position tracking, keyword research with 24 methods, one competitor per project and eight report templates; scheduled checks and white-label reporting are reserved for the paid editions. Those were shown on 24 September 2026 at $14.99 a month billed annually — $179 a year — against a struck-through list price of $59.67 a month, which is a discount on the day rather than a durable price.

Neither of these pays this site anything, and both are named here because for a site tracking twenty keywords they are the honest answer. The point at which a paid tracker earns its money is roughly where you need positions by city, by device, on a schedule, for someone else, or in a format you can hand over.

What a position actually is, and why every tracker is a camera

A rank tracker asks a search engine for your keyword on a schedule, from a place and a device it lets you choose, and writes down where you appeared. It is a camera pointed at a results page. It has no access to anything inside the engine, which is why no tracker can promise a true number and why the ones that talk about accuracy are selling confidence rather than measurement.

This is also the part of the category nobody markets. Google's own spam policies define machine-generated traffic as, in Google's words, the practice of sending automated queries to Google, and say this includes scraping results for rank-checking purposes or other types of automated access to Google Search conducted without express permission — conduct the same page says violates our spam policies and the Google Terms of Service. Every third-party rank tracker on this board works by doing exactly that at scale. It is not a reason to avoid them, and the practice has been routine for twenty years, but it is a reason to understand that you are buying an unofficial reading, and to keep Search Console as your source of record.

Picking one in five minutes

  1. Count your keywords, then add the ones you will add in six months. The step you land on decides almost everything.
  2. Decide whether you need more than Google: Bing, a second country, or a phone as well as a desktop. If you do not, the free options may finish the job.
  3. Count the people who need to open it. Per-seat charges can reverse the per-keyword ranking above.
  4. Start the free trial with your own keywords, not the demo project, and let it run a week so you see what the daily readings actually look like.
  5. Buy monthly first. Annual billing on this board saves between 10% and 20%, which is not enough to justify committing to a tool you have used for four days.

Questions this page gets asked

What is the cheapest rank tracker per keyword?
Of the entry plans with a published price on 24 September 2026, SE Ranking's Core plan is the cheapest per tracked keyword: $129.00 a month for 2,000 keywords tracked daily, which is about six cents each. Fill a plan further up and the ordering changes: AccuRanker's $224 Professional plan also offers a 5,000-keyword tier, which works out cheaper still. AccuRanker's Professional plan is about eleven cents at its 2,000-keyword tier, and Semrush's entry SEO plan is about twenty-eight cents because its 500-keyword allowance is small relative to its $139 price. Mangools publishes no price in its page, so it cannot be placed.
Is a free rank tracker good enough?
For a small site watching a short list, usually yes. Google Search Console is free, unlimited, and reports from Google's own data rather than by scraping, though it gives an average position across the queries you appeared for rather than a position you can watch move day to day. SEO PowerSuite's free Rank Tracker edition runs on your own machine and its feature list includes unlimited keyword position tracking, with scheduled checks reserved for the paid editions. Neither pays this site anything.
Why do two rank trackers show different positions for the same keyword?
Because each one takes its own reading, and there is no single position to be right about. The location it queries from, the device it emulates, the moment it looks, and how it counts the ads, local pack and generated answer above the organic results all move the number. Google itself calls its own position value a complex metric that can be misleading if you do not understand the subtleties. Treat the trend across weeks as the signal and any single day's number as noise.
Do rank trackers break Google's rules?
Google's spam policies define machine-generated traffic as sending automated queries to Google, and say this includes scraping results for rank-checking purposes or other types of automated access to Google Search conducted without express permission, which it says violates its spam policies and the Google Terms of Service. Third-party rank trackers work by doing this. In practice the exposure sits with the tool rather than with you, and the practice is long-established, but it is the reason Search Console should stay your source of record.
Should I pay annually?
Only after you have used the tool. On this board the annual savings are 20% at SE Ranking, 17% at Ahrefs and 10% at AccuRanker, which is real money but not enough to commit a year to a tool you tried for four days. Start monthly, load your own keywords rather than the demo project, and switch to annual at renewal if it is still open in your browser.
Does a bigger plan track more often, or just more keywords?
Mostly just more keywords. SE Ranking's Core and Growth plans both track daily and differ in allowance, projects and seats; AccuRanker describes daily updates across its tiers and reserves API depth, tagging and BigQuery access for the higher ones; Nightwatch tracks daily on every plan and differs in keywords and sites. Check whether what you actually need from the step up is frequency, seats, or somewhere to send the data.